Revenue and contract access
Large customers add SOC 2 to procurement checklists. Without a report, deals slow down or never reach signature.
Enterprise buyers stall deals until a SOC 2 report lands. Summit runs gap analysis, penetration testing and control validation, then hands your auditor a clean evidence pack so revenue keeps moving instead of waiting on security reviews.
Human-led VAPT · NDA first · report in 48h
The work is technical. The consequences of getting SOC 2 wrong show up in revenue, liability and reputation, which is why we report on it in the language of the boardroom first.
Large customers add SOC 2 to procurement checklists. Without a report, deals slow down or never reach signature.
Customer contracts often carry security warranties. Documented controls and testing show you took reasonable care.
A clean report, backed by independent testing, signals a mature supplier and shortens every later security review.
The observation window is fixed once it starts. Clear owners and a dated plan stop exceptions piling up inside it.
Enterprise customers add SOC 2 to security questionnaires and procurement checklists before they sign.
Banks and their customers expect independent proof that customer data and money movement are protected.
If you operate systems or process data for clients, they will ask how you control access and changes.
Anyone who stores or analyses customer data is expected to show confidentiality and security controls.
One accountable team takes you from scoping to retest. The people who test your systems are the people who explain the findings to your leadership.
Your current controls compared with the Trust Services Criteria, ranked by what blocks the audit first.
Manual, human-led testing of the applications and infrastructure in scope, with proof of impact.
Testing that the controls you describe operate in practice, before the auditor looks.
Organised test reports, scope statements and fix records mapped to the relevant criteria.
Guidance for engineers on each finding, then a retest and letter confirming the fixes.
A plain-language summary of risk, progress and next steps for executives.
Timelines are typical ranges, not promises. Yours depends on scope, team size and how much is already in place.
Decide which categories you need and which systems and teams are in scope. Fewer, well-chosen categories mean a shorter audit.
Compare your current controls with the criteria and list what is missing, from policies to access reviews.
Put controls in place and make sure they leave evidence automatically, such as tickets, logs and approvals.
Run a manual penetration test and fix the findings, so auditors see vulnerabilities found and closed.
For a Type II report, controls must operate during the whole observation window. Keep evidence organised as you go.
The CPA firm tests your controls, asks follow-up questions and issues the report.
Every engagement ends with material written for two audiences: a plain-language view for executives and the board, and full technical detail for the engineers who fix things.
Posture, top risks and what they mean for revenue, in a few pages.
Owners, milestones and the audit window mapped to your sales calendar.
Reports and retest letters ready to hand over on request.
Every finding with an owner, severity and status you can follow.
The same Summit team stays with you to answer auditor follow-ups.
SOC 2 is an attestation report, not a certificate. An independent CPA firm examines the controls a service organisation has in place and gives an opinion on whether they meet the Trust Services Criteria published by the AICPA. You choose which categories are in scope, and Security is always included. Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality and Privacy are optional.
There are two report types. A Type I report says your controls were suitably designed on a single date. A Type II report goes further and tests whether those controls operated effectively across an observation period, which is usually between three and twelve months. Most enterprise buyers want Type II because it shows the controls work in practice, not just on paper.
The report is private. You share it with customers under NDA, normally alongside a short summary and a bridge letter that covers the time between the end of the audit period and today.
The Trust Services Criteria are written as control objectives, not as a checklist. Here is how each category translates into everyday engineering and operations work.
Every SOC 2 audit includes the Common Criteria. They cover the control environment, communication, risk assessment, monitoring, control activities, logical and physical access, system operations, change management and risk mitigation. In practice this is where most of your policies, access reviews, logging and vulnerability management are tested.
Add this category if you commit to uptime or recovery targets. Auditors look at capacity planning, backups, disaster recovery and how you respond when systems fail.
This category fits services that calculate, transform or move data on a customer’s behalf, such as billing engines or payment flows. Auditors check that processing is complete, valid, accurate and authorised.
Choose this category when customers send you confidential business data. It covers how you classify information, encrypt it, restrict who can see it and dispose of it.
The Privacy category applies when you collect and use personal information. It maps to notice, choice and consent, access, disclosure, quality and monitoring. It is separate from legal compliance with laws such as GDPR, although many teams reuse the same evidence.
SOC 2 does not name penetration testing as a mandatory control. Auditors do, however, routinely ask for it as proof that you find and fix vulnerabilities. A manual, human-led test with a clear report and a retest is the strongest evidence you can hand them.
Management must evaluate whether controls are present and working. An independent penetration test is a separate evaluation that auditors can read directly.
Criteria around detecting new vulnerabilities and configuration changes. Test reports show you look beyond automated scans.
Boundary protection for systems exposed to the internet. External testing demonstrates how those boundaries hold up.
Significant changes should be tested before release. A retest after fixes shows the change process closes the loop.
If controls are not operating yet, exceptions pile up inside the observation window. Run a readiness check first.
Automated scans find known issues. Auditors and buyers want to see a human tester chain weaknesses and prove impact.
Each extra category adds controls to build and test. Choose the ones your customers actually ask for.
Screenshots gathered a week before the audit rarely hold up. Capture evidence continuously from tickets, logs and approvals.
No. It is an attestation report written by an independent CPA firm. There is no certificate and no pass or fail badge, only the auditor’s opinion and any exceptions they list.
Type I checks that controls are designed properly on one date. Type II tests that they operated effectively over a period, usually three to twelve months. Enterprise buyers generally prefer Type II.
Teams that already have solid practices can finish in a few months. Starting from scratch often takes six to twelve months once readiness work and a Type II observation window are included.
The criteria do not use those words, but auditors commonly request penetration test evidence under the monitoring and vulnerability management criteria. Most teams run at least one test per year.
Yes. Many early-stage companies do it to unblock enterprise deals. Keep the scope narrow, automate evidence collection and begin with Security only.
Browse all 23 security and compliance frameworks or see our penetration testing services.
Last reviewed October 2026. Requirements change; confirm current texts and dates before you commit to a plan.
Tell us your scope, your deadline and who is asking. You get a fixed-scope quote in 15 minutes and a named lead from day one.
Get a Quote in 15 mins →Disclaimer. Summit provides independent technical and risk assessments. This is not legal advice or a regulatory certification. Acceptance of any report is decided by the requesting auditor, customer or regulator.